In a study of more than 1 million adult patients cared for in 54 hospitals, researchers found that nurse staffing levels were similar in safety-net and non-safety net hospitals, yet patients’ outcomes were worse in safety-net hospitals. The study, published in Medical Care, found that in non-safety net hospitals, higher nurse staffing rates and a larger number of registered nurses (RNs) were associated with fewer deaths due to congestive health failure; fewer incidents in which nurses did not note or initiate treatment in life-threatening situations (failure to rescue); lower rates of infection, including postoperative sepsis; and fewer patients who were required to stay in the hospital for longer than expected. In ICUs, higher total hours of nursing care per day was associated with fewer infections and decubitus ulcers, while RN skill mix was associated with fewer cases of sepsis.
With the same nurse staffing levels, safety-net hospitals had higher rates of congestive heart failure mortality, decubitus ulcers, and failure to rescue. The authors hypothesize that the worse outcomes in safety-net hospitals are likely a function of patients’ poorer health rather than staffing ratios.
http://www.hfma.org/blogrss.ashx